Norman v Future Publishing Limited Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Norman v Future Publishing Limited - Essay ExampleThe appellates original complaint went as stated in the originating Statement of Claim went on to pronounce that the publication of the words utilise had the result of placing the appellant into ridicule, mockery and contempt. It was also alleged that the words used in the publication had caused serious injury to the appellants personal and professional reputation and in any event to her feelings. Lord Buckley, the judge at first instance struck out Normans Statement of Claim, essentially ruling that the words used, when taking together with the entire article could non be construed in the manner pleaded by Norman. Norman then appealed to the Court of Appeal against the lower coquettes decision under site 82, Rule 3A of the Rules of Supreme Court, 1994 which provides that any party to a denigrative action may apply to a judge in chambers for an order determining whether or not the words complained of are receptive of bearing ce rtain meanings or the meanings complained on in the originating process. The Order goes on to provide that if the judge upon hearing such an application agrees that the words complained of are not capable of bearing the meaning alleged in the pleadings he is at liberty to dismiss the claim or make such other order as he deems just and fair. The Court of Appeal went on to state that although appeals under this Order are typically discouraged, when the result of the order is to dismiss the action completely as it did in Normas case, or to take away from the jury the consideration.